Good
to see mobile payments make it on to the national TV, although as the BBC's
technology correspondent Rory Cellan-Jones take on it nearly made me choke on
my cornflakes. Reacting to the O2 Wallet launch a month ago (on the ball the
Beeb science team), he downloaded it - along with Barclay's Bank's PingIt and
Starbucks' loyalty app and set forth to spend a day not using cash. He failed.
And
while he was forthright in saying it was all just hype and that mobile payments
were nowhere near where operators would have us believe, he did concede that it
was coming.
The
interesting thing about this was the viewer feedback to the story. Most hated
the idea of using their mobile to store money and pay, claiming that if they
lost the phone they were double-stuck having no money and phone.
So
what does this mean? Well, keep up the good work everyone, it will come, but it
shows just how far off true mobile payments actually are. The tools are
starting to appear now, but getting people to use them is going to be mighty
hard. Even if Apple does build NFC into this summer's iPhone 5.
Cellan-Jones
did mention at the very end of his report the fact that he hadn't mentioned
NFC. Rightly he sees this as not a done deal in how mobile payments will work,
and I agree. But what he failed to look into was the how on-bill payments are
starting to be used. Following the launch this month at the Connected Summit of
payforit4 and the news this week that Cross Country Trains are using it in
earnest, I think it remiss - though not wholly unexpected - that this wasn't
even touched on. OK so I won't be paying for my groceries with Pfi4, but nor
can I with O2's wallet (the setting up of, on a phone, is fiendishly confusing:
three different passwords to create and remember).
This is backed up by the latest findings
from Gartner, which, while concluding that worldwide value of mobile payment
transactions would increase 62%, from $105.9 billion in 2011 to $171.5 billion
this year, did face problems.
Until
bank accounts, payment cards and phones are all tied together securely with buy
in of handset makers, operators, banks, merchants and the consumer, this sort
of mobile payment environment isn't going to work. Right now it's good for
digital purchase, works ok for small value ones where the infrastructure to
actually use it exists, but that's about it.
Will
someone like Apple or Google, PayPal or Amazon crack it first then things will
change dramatically, but even they need the merchant and consumer buy in and,
if the BBC's report - which talked to real people out there, not mobileheads
and geeks - then the isn't even that much appetite for actually doing it.
Will
this change as it becomes more prevalent and early adopters start to flash it
about the place? I think it may actually be unlikely. Banks want to get rid of
cash as it costs them money (ironically) to handle and distribute it, but even
now it has taken decades to get people using debit cards and still most people
prefer to use good hard cash.
The
role of mobile payments, I believe, is in on phone/on device purchases, not
perhaps wafting it about with NFC to pay for your supermarket shopping or a
pack of ciggies or a pint. While I would love to stand outside a crowded pub
and buy my round simply by clicking an app which ordered it, paid for it and
saw it brought to me, I don't see it happening any time soon.
Hwan Chung, CEO of Danal CS&F sums it
up nicely. “The past six months have seen a plethora of mobile payments and
mobile banking services brought to market,” he says. “Operators, banks and
technology providers are all investing heavily in this channel to open up new
revenue streams but there is still a distinct lag in end-user adoption. Part of
the problem is that the options being offered to consumers at the moment are
too limited.
“Operators are asking end users to set up
mobile wallets so that the CSP can leverage their existing relationships,” he
continues. “This begs the question of why consumers should be asked to set up
yet another account when they already have an established relationship with the
end user via billing? Over the next few years I think we’ll see that the most
successful mobile payment services are those that not only strike a careful
balance between ease of use and security, but make life a lot simpler for the consumer.
After all, at its heart, mobile payment should be primarily about convenience.”
Where
Telemedia does come into this is in the role it can play in allowing for simple
in app or on device payments. That is what mobile payments really is going to
be about for the next five years at least.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hey, why not leave a comment... along with your email address: